|
"Clients
of Dittmar & Indrenius praise the dedication of the team,
which 'takes time to get to know our business'."
"Dittmar
& Indrenius is able to provide both corporate support and
advisory work to a high level."
(The
European Legal 500, 2011)
"Although
smaller in size than many of its competitors, this firm is highly
active in the marketplace and has been experiencing an increasing
amount of instructions - particularly on IT outsourcing projects
- for a list of loyal clients that includes Hewlett-Packard,
CA Software Finland and Lexmark Finland. The team's best-known
IT lawyer is Sakari Halonen, who is rated highly for
his 'flexibility, responsiveness and round-the-clock
availability'. Clients also value his ability 'to
get to the core of a problem immediately'. One of Halonen's
recent highlights was advising Capgemini's Finnish operations on
several complex new technology and IT outsourcing projects."
(Chambers
Europe, The World´s Leading Lawyers for Business, 2009)
Recent references:
D&I
advised Capgemini in the global outsourcing of the financial transaction
processing of Stora Enso, a Finnish global group producing integrated
paper, packaging and forest products.
D&I advised Capgemini in the global outsourcing of the IT
infrastructure and SAP support services of Kemira, a Finnish global
group of leading chemical businesses.
D&I continuously advises a number of multinationals with Finnish
law aspects in their dealings with Nokia and Nokia Siemens Networks.
D&I continuously advises Specsavers in data protection and
direct marketing compliance matters and has also advised the company
in a number of contentious trademark and tradename matters.
D&I advised GlaxoSmithKline in global data protection and
personal data policy issues.
D&I continuously advises a number of new multinationals such
as Colgate-Palmolive in the Finnish aspects of its trademark portfolio
management and also several Finnish multinationals on a global
basis.
D&I has continuously advised Oriflame in a number of trademark
matters, including a dispute regarding the "O" symbol,
and a patent licensing matter.
|