Government Proposal on New Interest Limitation Rules in Finland

D&I Tax & Structuring Alert

Posted on

27 Sep

2018

Share this

Dittmar & Indrenius > Insight > Government Proposal on New Interest Limitation Rules in Finland

First Step for Implementation of the EU’s Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive

The Finnish Government has today issued a government proposal on new limitations to the deductibility of interest expenses implementing the interest limitation rules of the EU’s Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (2016/1164).

Compared to the draft government proposal which was published in January this year, the new proposal is in some aspects more lenient and addresses some of the concerns raised earlier in public consultation. The most significant changes are the introduction of the so-called grandfathering rule as well as the re-introduction of the current balance sheet exemption and a financial industry exemption.

Nevertheless, the new interest limitations significantly expand the scope of the currently applicable rules. Additionally, many uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation and the exact implications of the newly proposed rules.

Limitations to the Deductibility of Interest

The proposed rules expand the scope of application to cover both new types of taxpayers and a wider range of interest payments.

The key characteristics of the new limitation rules can be summarized as follows:

  • The deductibility of net interest expenses would remain generally limited to 25% of EBITD (taxable business profit added with interest expenses, tax depreciations, and net group contributions);
  • the general threshold of EUR 500,000 would still apply, but a new safe harbor threshold of EUR 3,000,000 would be introduced in relation to net interest expenses on third party debt;
  • the definition of interest is broadened to cover considerations such as guarantee fees;
  • the limitations would also apply to interest paid to third parties, such as interest on bank loans;
  • the limitations would apply to all Finnish resident corporate taxpayers, and also companies taxed under the Income Tax Act, such as real estate companies, that are excluded from the application of the current limitation rules;
  • however, the new rules include a grandfathering rule that excludes third party loans concluded before 17 June 2016 from the scope of application;
  • the exclusion available for financial institutions; and
  • the current balance sheet test exemption remains.

Implications

The new rules will indirectly increase the cost of debt and therefore impact both business considerations and market practices.

New Taxpayers and Structures Covered

Groups with centralized external financing may also face new challenges with interest deductibility (e.g. publicly listed parent company bonds). Private equity structures (e.g. including leveraged holding companies and profit participating loans) and real estate investments are among those most significantly impacted by the expansion of the scope of applicability.

The new rules are suggested to apply to, inter alia, real estate companies and other non-business companies.

Definition of Interest

The definition of interest is widened. The new definition covers costs economically equivalent to interest expenses such as guarantee fees. However, according to the government proposal e.g. financial leases are not considered to fall under the new definition of interest, contrary to the draft government proposal.

The Grandfathering Rule

The exemption of third party loans concluded before 17 June 2016 is welcomed, but raises questions with respect to its interpretation, as the exemption would not apply to any “subsequent modification” of such loans.

The potential impact of refinancing activities and other changes to loan terms performed on 17 June 2016 or later should be evaluated in order to determine whether the grandfathering rule would apply. The implications of the grandfathering rule should also be considered in connection with any future modifications of loans or refinancings since those may in some cases significantly increase the indirect costs for refinancing.

The grandfathering rule would also apply to interests capitalized in taxation before 1 January 2019.

Applicability of the New Rules

Parliament is expected to decide on the government proposal later this year. Major changes to the proposed rules are not anticipated. The proposed new rules would be applied already for the tax year 2019 i.e. financial periods ending during 2019.

It is recommendable for companies and investors to assess the impact of the new rules to their current financing structures. Since the new rules will be applicable very shortly, and for some companies the rules already apply to the ongoing tax year, we recommend that this assessment is made as soon as possible.

We are happy to discuss the proposed changes with you.

Latest Insights

alert
The Government Proposal on Changes in Taxation of Electricity Storage
8 Nov 2018 The Government Proposal regarding amendments to energy taxation has been submitted to the Parliament on 18 October. The most significant changes relate to electricity storages. Pursuant to the Proposal, electricity would be transferred to electricity storages without any excise duty on electricity. The excise duty would be paid when electricity is transferred to be consumed. The need for electricity storages has arisen since more and more electricity has been produced by using renewable energy sources such as wind and solar which are not flexible. The electricity storages can be used to even out the variation in supply and demand of electricity and prices. However, current legislation does not recognize electricity storages at all. Therefore, the excise duty on electricity has been paid twice, for example, in circumstances where the storage has been first charged from the grid and later supplied back to the grid to be consumed. The purpose of the Proposal is that transmission of electricity to the electricity storage would be duty free. The excise duty would be paid when electricity is transferred to be consumed from the duty free electricity storage. The condition would be the electricity storage is deemed to be a part of the grid or a power plant; or an owner of the electricity storage has a permission from the Tax Administration to uphold the duty free energy storage. In order to meet the purpose of the Proposal the definition of the grid would be broadened. The electricity storage would be deemed to be a part of the grid if the electricity storage is connected to the grid and no electricity can be transferred to be consumed from the electricity storage. In addition, the definition of a power plant would be changed. In the future, the power plant would mean a fixed functional unit which acts in a certain area and its purpose is to produce electricity (and heating) and store electricity in the electricity storage. Owners of electricity storages which are not a part of a grid or a power plant in accordance with the law should apply permission of the Tax Administration in order to be owners of a duty free electricity storage. Consequently, the Proposal allows duty free electricity storage for different operators as power plants, grid companies or end consumers or storage service providers. The recast electricity market directive, currently under legislative process in the EU, seeks to promote market based energy storage. It would limit the distribution and transmission systems operators (DSO and TSO) involvement with energy storage facilities. Among others, DSOs and TSOs would be prohibited from owning and operating storage facilities, except in cases where no other parties have expressed interest, or where the storage facility is necessary for fulfilling the DSO's or TSO's obligations. Exceptions are subject to approval of the regulator. Member States would have to re-assess whether third parties would be able to own, develop and manage or operate the storage facilities, in which case the operations of DSOs and TSOs would be phased out. We welcome the removal of double taxation. However, according to the Proposal, the electricity storage means only a unit of equipment, machines and buildings which are required in order to temporary store electricity electrochemically. Our view is that the definition of an electricity storage should not be limited only to storages based on electrochemical technology. The limitation might delay development of new technology and its adoption to use. Taxation should be neutral for all technology solutions. With the current wording, storage solutions based on for example power-to-gas or kinetic technology would not be duty free. The purpose of other, more technical, changes to energy taxation is to promote the use of natural gas instead of coal, which is part of the Government's plan to encourage the early phase-out of combined heat and power plants using coal by 2029. The proposed changes would enter into force in the beginning of 2019. Due to developments in technology and promotion of the transfer towards more sustainable energy system, changes in energy taxation as well as energy storages in general can be expected also on the EU level. We are happy to discuss in more detail the proposed legislation in concrete situations.
alert
New CFC Rules Require Review of Corporate Structures
6 Nov 2018 The Finnish Government issued a government proposal on controlled foreign company ("CFC") rules on 1 November.  The proposed rules would enter into force at the beginning of 2019 and would apply already for tax year 2019. Through these rules, the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (2016/1164, the "Directive") adopted by the EU is further implemented in Finland. The proposed rules are stricter than the currently applicable CFC rules in particular for Finnish companies with subsidiaries outside of the European Economic Area ("EEA"). In principle, the government proposal follows the main features of the draft proposal published earlier this year with the exception of widening the exempted activities to certain services. Overview of Proposed Rules General In brief, foreign entity's income is subject to CFC taxation in Finland if a Finnish tax resident, together with its related parties, has sufficient control in the foreign entity, the foreign entity's level of taxation is significantly lower than in Finland, and the genuine economic activities exemption is not applicable. If an entity qualifies as a CFC, the proportion of the income of the CFC controlled by Finnish tax residents is taxed as their income in Finland. According to the proposed new rules, the type of income received by the foreign entity or the artificial nature of the transactions would not be relevant in the assessment. Thus, Finland would not implement either of the alternative models laid out in the Directive as such but instead the new rules follow similar approach as the current rules. Control The new proposal imposes a participation threshold of 25% for the CFC rules to apply. The participation by the Finnish resident's related parties (based on also the 25% threshold) in the foreign entity is included in the assessment. This presented participation threshold is significantly stricter than the 50% threshold adopted by the Directive and the 50% threshold of the current CFC rules. In practice, the low CFC threshold significantly expands the scope of the rules. It may also prove to be challenging to obtain necessary information to assess potential CFC taxation when the participation in the CFC is e.g. only 25%. Level of Taxation According to the proposal, a CFC is an entity with an actual level of taxation of less than 60% of the actual level of taxation the entity would be subject to in Finland. Finland’s current corporate income tax rate is 20%, which leads to an effective tax rate threshold of 12%, when the foreign entity's taxable income is calculated in accordance with the Finnish rules. The level of taxation is assessed separately for each year. The proposed new rules do not take into account the timing differences, e.g. different depreciation rules. More accelerated depreciation rules than the Finnish depreciation rules may trigger CFC taxation for the years when larger depreciations are deducted even though the level of taxation over the years would not be lower than the above mentioned threshold. Exempted Activities The main exemption in the proposed rules is the genuine economic activities exemption. The concept of genuine economic activities is assessed differently depending whether the foreign entity is a EEA resident company or not. The proposal follows the Directive’s, as well as the current CFC rules', framework of excluding EEA resident companies with genuine economic activities from CFC taxation. This requires sufficient level of personnel, premises and assets. Outside the EEA, the concept of genuine economic activities also requires that the entity carries out certain type of business activity. The new rules exempt only companies the income of which mainly arises from industrial or other comparable production activities, shipping activities, as well as sales or marketing activities related to such exempt activities. The government proposal widens the current concept of activities comparable to production activities to include marketable services. However, the proposal lists service activities which are not comparable to production activities, such as certain investment management services, holding and transferring of intangibles, as well as intra-group financing, insurance and management services.In addition, adequate exchange of information procedures need to be in place between Finland and other state, and the other state cannot be listed as non-cooperative tax jurisdiction by the EU, for the exemption to apply.Contrary to the currently applicable CFC rules, which have required that the sales and marketing activities could only be performed in the company’s state of residence in order for the exemption to apply, the new CFC rules would also exempt regional sales and marketing hubs from the applicability of the rules, provided that the operations relate to industrial production or comparable activities. This change will provide more flexibility for companies with regional activities. The current exemption applicable to tax treaty resident companies would be abolished. Consequently, the effective level of taxation of such non-EEA resident companies, which do not fall under the genuine economic activities exemption, needs to be monitored. Implications As discussed above, the scope of the application of the CFC rules is significantly widened due to the newly proposed amendments. The different approaches compared to the Directive, as well as compared to the current rules, will likely cause issues to numerous taxpayers. Pursuant to the new rules, genuine business operations subject to low taxation in non-EEA countries may classify as CFCs. In particular, intra-group and other service activities as well as holding company structures may trigger CFC taxation in situations that have so far not been subject to the current CFC rules. Inclusion of service activities to the scope of exempted activities is a welcomed feature but the definition in the proposal leaves room for interpretation. An advance ruling on the interpretation in specific cases may be recommendable in order to achieve certainty on the treatment. Due to the Directive, all EU countries need to implement CFC rules. Also many other jurisdictions have already implemented or will implement CFC rules. This may lead to the taxation of the same company's income as CFC income in several jurisdictions. The proposed Finnish CFC rules do not take this type of double taxation into account at all. Group structures with multiple layers of companies should therefore be reviewed from this perspective. On the other hand, the new rules introduce new options to enhance the group structure for many operators with regional activities due to the extension of the scope of sales and marketing exemption. Do not hesitate to contact us with respect to the proposed changes, we are happy to discuss the matter and its implications to your circumstances.

Share this

Dittmar & Indrenius